🔗 Share this article

I possess some opinions regarding the comments delivered by ESPN commentator Chris Fowler following Novak Djokovic's victory over the American player in the US Open quarter-finals. Consider – Fritz is American, Fowler is American – and sports frequently encourage nationalism. A little bit of disappointment would have been appropriate. Instead, he invoked the continued drought of US male players at grand slam tournaments: none of them has won a trophy since Andy Roddick in 2003, and he had been the final representative in the tournament.

We all love a storyline, myself included. But really. Even if the American defeated the legend for the first time, force of nature Carlos Alcaraz was looming in the next round, who Fritz has never defeated in an competitive encounter. And had he someway survived that, it would have been defending champion the Italian, against whom Fritz had lost 10 of the last 11 sets. The two young stars had also split the previous seven major titles (and Alcaraz proceeded to defeat a tired Serbian in the next round). He stated in post-match interviews after the loss that he actually liked his draw, because it presented the chance to defeat the three best players in the sport in succession. Fritz is well within his right to aspire to the achievement; an athlete is meant to believe in themselves. But entering that Serbian quarter-final what other person sensibly had the lack of American champions in mind?

The American star's weaker delivery the sole barrier between her and consistent victories

The American, 28, is placed fourth in the world starting this week’s year-end championships and has secured his last six matches over third-ranked Alexander Zverev with increasing ease. Presumably he could claim that position for himself in the coming years. But it’s clear that right now, that is as far as he can climb: Sinner and Alcaraz sit a vast gap of ranking points away. His elite delivery and powerful power on both front side and backhand are more than enough to defeat most rivals on the professional circuit. Against the handful of generational talents, however, he is often overmatched. The last several years has witnessed the curious emergence of tall, gangly players who can nonetheless cover the court with the alarming quickness and grace of smaller players. Fritz is six-foot-five and looks it. His footwork is rigid, as if he’s still getting used to his legs. So he’ll rarely steal a point that the opponent was dictating, and playing a drop shot versus him is typically a safe bet. That acts as a pretty harsh restriction on his potential.

Fritz has made a number of significant, unexpected advancements throughout his career. At the beginning of the ten-year period, he was circling the lower end of the top 30. Two years after, he was approaching the elite ten. The previous season, he unexpectedly surged up to fourth place – and held the spot. But the next leap, mixing it up with and beating legendary figures like Alcaraz, the Italian, and even a aging Serbian, is the toughest of all. What could the commentator thinking? That Fritz, in 2025, was a legitimate contender to defeat them all back-to-back? That it was appropriate commenting on the continuing slump of US male players winning grand slams when he had departed the New York major in the quarter-finals? The thirst is just excessive and the respect for the magnitude of the challenge too little.

Taylor Fritz made a personal best advancement to the Wimbledon semi-finals in the summer.

Fritz’s performance in that very last eight match should have been sufficient of an sign. Djokovic won in four rounds, a victory that only seemed tenuous for moments towards the very end, when Fritz had saved a couple match points and had a opportunity to hold for 5-5. The pair looked well-balanced during the rallies, with the American earning numerous chances to break. But Djokovic saved service break opportunity after service break opportunity, prolonging the streak to the brink of frustration. When he eventually did convert a single of the chances at 5-5 in the middle stanza, he promptly produced a terrible game to drop serve once more; the Serbian had lulled him into a battle secondary to the main contest and compelled him to use far too much effort to prevail. Facing set points in the final game, his first serve floated to heaven. He extended the match two times on his backup delivery, but finally double-faulted. It was not a choke, I didn’t think, just a consequence of having to hit too many weaker deliveries.

The match was fairly compelling proof that Fritz is not good enough to defeat any form of Djokovic, who was defeated by the Spaniard in the next round and did not especially appeared like he believed he could triumph. This is absolutely fine – Djokovic is the greatest of all time, and may not be at the peak of his athletic abilities anymore, but has developed sufficient experience and tactical know-how to compensate for quite a bit of the decline. The issue is the individuals who were anticipating Fritz to win, and putting pressure on him to do so, when he was yet to done anything that suggested he could.

Fritz is an valuable contributor to the tour nonetheless. He’s a calm, thoughtful presence in media sessions, more so than almost everyone on the ATP aside from Daniil Medvedev, willing to not just say his emotions or the tactic he believed determined a match, but clarify it. That he ought to bear the brunt of the blame for America not spawn a male major champion since Andy Roddick feels unjust. (Since Ben Shelton is rubbing shoulders with him in the standings, maybe they can divide that load.)

Year-End Championships: Singles Groups

Jimmy Connors Division

• Carlos Alcaraz (Sp)
• Taylor Fritz (US)
• Alex de Minaur (Aus)
• The Italian stylist

Bjorn Borg Group

• The Italian champion
• The German powerhouse
• The rising American
• Félix Auger-Aliassime (Can)

“I would likely dwell on it indefinitely if I don’t accomplish it,” Fritz informed a journalist in the summer of claiming a grand slam. It is hoped he understands that he’s not a failure if he does not achieve that objective, that overcoming Alcaraz and Sinner’s dominant, formidable reign is actually highly unlikely for everybody else. {